Stainless Steel Evaporator (Stainless Steel Evaporator Coil) — Full Guide
Who should read: refrigeration system integrators, EPC contractors, cold room engineering companies, data center cooling engineers, industrial HVAC procurement teams
A stainless steel evaporator is an evaporating heat exchanger coil—typically using 304 or 316L stainless steel tubes and, depending on environment, stainless or coated aluminum fins—where liquid refrigerant (NH3, CO2, HFO, or hydrocarbon) enters, boils inside the tubing, and absorbs heat from air, glycol, or brine passing over the coil bank.
Why stainless exists: traditional copper-tube + aluminum-fin (Cu/Al) coils prematurely fail in aggressive atmospheres. Stainless steel eliminates the galvanic couple (Al/Cu), resists chloride and chemical attack, and tolerates frequent high-pressure sanitation.
2. How does a stainless steel evaporator work?
Refrigerant side
Low-pressure liquid enters via distributor → feeders → coil circuits.
Heat flows through tube wall; refrigerant evaporates and becomes saturated vapor.
Vapor exits to the suction header and compressor.
Air / secondary fluid side
Air/glycol/brine crosses fins; heat is extracted; outlet temperature drops.
In low-temp rooms, frost forms → defrost strategy must protect U-value.
Key design reality: performance depends on the overall heat-transfer coefficient (U)—dominated by air-side convection, fin geometry, and distribution—not only on base metal conductivity.
3. Main types of stainless steel evaporator assemblies
Configuration
Typical use
Tube / Fin
Notes
SS tube + SS fin
Coastal, chemical, ammonia plants
304/316L tube + 304 fin
Highest corrosion class; premium CAPEX; longest life.
SS tube + coated Al fin
Mild marine or urban industrial air
304/316L tube + hydrophobic coated Al
Balanced cost/performance; coating quality is critical.
SS bare tube banks
Glycol/brine coolers; high fouling risk
SS tube; no fin
Lower air-side HTC; used when sanitation aggressiveness is extreme.
Flooded SS coil modules
Large NH3 industrial evaporators
316L construction
Shell/coil banks with separators and oil management.
4. Why stainless vs. copper/aluminum?
4.1 Conductivity vs. system U-value
Material
Thermal conductivity λ (W/m·K)
Copper
~400
Aluminum
~205
Stainless steel (304/316)
~15–17
Despite lower λ, designers achieve the same or better coil capacity by tuning fin density, louver geometry, face velocity, circuiting, and tube wall—because U is largely constrained by the air side and frost, not by tube conductivity alone.
4.2 Failure modes avoided
Failure mode (Cu/Al)
Mechanism
Stainless mitigation
Galvanic corrosion
Al/Cu dissimilar pairing
SS tube + SS fin removes galvanic couple
Chloride pitting
Coastal salt & cleaning agents
316L exhibits superior pitting resistance
Fin deformation
High-pressure washdowns
SS fin withstands mechanical cleaning
Ammonia attack on copper
Chemical incompatibility
SS compatible with NH3
4.3 Total cost of ownership (TCO)
Even with +50–80% CAPEX uplift, stainless coils typically deliver 25–40% lower 10-year TCO by avoiding early coil replacements, product loss, and downtime.
5. Applications where stainless is the “correct answer”
Coastal cold rooms / blast freezers: chloride-laden air destroys Al fins; SS fin survives.
Ammonia refrigeration (NH3): copper is incompatible; SS is preferred.
Leak test with dry nitrogen; dehydrate; charge per manufacturer’s circuit map.
Tune EEV/orifices for uniform frosting during trial run; re-balance if a bank starves.
8. Maintenance & serviceability
High-pressure cleaning (150–200 bar) approved for SS fins/tubes; use compatible detergents.
Track coil ΔP and approach temperature to predict fouling; schedule defrost and deep-clean.
In ammonia plants, verify oil return protocols and separator performance quarterly.
SS coils are weld-repairable; fin straightening is feasible; spares: distributors, EEVs, fan motors.
9. Quick selection table (copy into your RFQ)
Parameter
Your Input
Refrigerant
NH3 / CO2 / HFO / HC
Evaporating temperature
°C (e.g., −10, −30)
Air in/out (room setpoint)
°C / RH
Capacity target
kW or TR
Fin type
SS fin / coated Al fin / bare tube
Fin pitch
FPI (e.g., 6/8/10/12)
Tube OD / thickness
mm (e.g., 12.7 × 0.8)
Atmosphere
Coastal chloride mg/m³, sulfur gases, chemicals
Sanitation regime
HP washdown? daily/weekly; detergents used
Electrical/fan constraints
Voltage, max sound, ESP, VFD yes/no
Expected lifecycle
Years (target 10+)
Compliance
PED/ASME; hygiene audit notes
10. Frequently asked questions (FAQ)
Q1. Stainless conducts heat worse—does that hurt performance?
Coil performance hinges on U, not base metal λ alone. Designers compensate by increasing effective area and air-side HTC; practical results match or exceed Cu/Al in the same duty—while surviving aggressive environments.
Q2. Where is stainless mandatory?
Coastal, ammonia, sanitation-heavy food plants, sulfur-bearing atmospheres, petrochemical sites, and clean facilities subject to harsh cleaning chemicals.
Q3. Will fan power go up?
It can if geometry is copied 1:1. Properly engineered SS coils adjust fin pitch, row count, and face velocity to keep pressure drop within the target, often with no net increase in fan power.
Q4. SS tube + coated Al fin vs. full SS fin—how to choose?
For mild coastal/industrial air, coated Al fin can be a cost-effective compromise. For daily HP washdowns, heavy chlorides, or long life guarantees, choose full SS fin.
Q5. What about defrost?
Match method (hot gas, electric, glycol) to frost rate and duty cycle. Ensure pan geometry, drain sizing, and airflow routing avoid re-entrainment and ice bridges.